Mayor in his Commentary on Pliny's Letters, Book III (London, 1880), p. The inclusion of more than a very small fraction of all these examples was forbidden by the plan of this book, but the information which they furnish lies behind many

Into a third, interleaved, I copied a number of classical examples from Professor Mayor's annotated copies. 'The margins of the first copy became after about five years so crowded that I had to purchase a second, which in its turn has become just as full. The present work was in effect begun about half a century ago when, in imitation of my dear master Mayor, I began to add words and examples to a copy of Lewis and Short. It has been my own good fortune, during a period of half a century, to discover yet further missing words.? I have also made use of Arnaldo (1939). Recognize the real situation and their вЂcanons covering the whole field of Latinity often crumble, when sifted, into an inference from ForcelliniвЂ™s silence'.! Lexicographers like De Vit, Georges, Mayor, Nettleship, von Paucker, Quicherat, RГіnsch, and von Wolfflin, whose work is incorporated in great part in the handy compilation of Benoist-Goelzer (1893 and later) and in the Laterculi Vocum Latinarum of Gradenwitz (1904), have been able to fill up many gaps in the work of those who followed Forcellini. But the compilers whose work is based on his, Freund, Andrews, Riddle-White, and Lewis-Short, did not The great work of Forcellini was entitled Lexicon Totius Latinitatis, though as a matter of fact he had left unread a number of writings of value, especially such as had not been composed in Italy. 600) was therefore chosen as the limit for our purpose. 450 would have excluded Boethius, Gregory the Great, Gregory of Tours, Caesarius of Arles, and Cassiodorus, each a writer of special importance in his own way. Neither author is typical of his time, moreover, and the modern reader of Latin written just after the middle of the sixth certtuty: or of such works as the translations of Oribasius, which belong to the same,century, already sees clear signs that the traditional Latin grammar is breaking up. Each of these two was the greatest writer of his own day in Europe, but of the larger part of their writings we still lack critical editions which would indicate the written sources fromywhich their works were largely compiled. It might have been possible to continue as far as Isidore of Seville (636) or as far as the Venerable Bede (735). It was obvious that no attempt could be made to cover such an extent of ground as will be investigated by those researchers who are collecting material for a hew Ducange. When this decision had been reached, the question arose to what date the glossary should extend. But it was thought advisable to supplement the work by a separate brief glossary of the new forms, meanings, and phrases which appear for the first time after that date, so that students might have some help in reading authors like Ausonius, Claudian, and Ammian, or the City of God and Confessions of St.

Thus Christian Latin authors were excluded. PREFACE Wes plans were being made for a new Oxford Latin Dictionary, it was decided not to include in the main work writers who flourished later than about A.D. Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E.C.4 GLASGOWДЇIRST EDITION I949 REPRINTED LITHOGRAPHICALLY IN GREAT BRITAIN AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, OXFORD FROM CORRECTED SHEETS OF THE FIRST EDITION 1957 SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AT CLAREMONT California

Mary ann sieve shaker manual lawn